What does any of this have to do with the EARN-IT act? This all appears to be just claims about possible uses of encryption with no particular relation to the subject of the article. If these other uses of encryption you're discussing wouldn't be affected by the EARN-IT act, then they aren't relevant here.
The article is about the EARN-IT act specifically. If your points only relate to the war on encryption in general, and not the EARN-IT act specifically, then they do not bear on the article.
