Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It amazes me how many people will list something for sale on Craigslist without publishing obvious facts like model numbers. There's an upside if you a buyer who compares your price for the used item with the price for a new-but-superior item. However, the downside risk of wasting your time with people who walk away once learning the details of the item seems to outweigh this benefit.

Perhaps the greatest downside is that people like me will determine that the person selling the item is an idiot and apply a discount factor for the risk of even dealing with them.



This might hint at one reason CraigsList still exists as it does. There is powerful signaling built into how people make their listing. It conveys a lot about who the seller is and how the transaction will work.


Some friends who are using OkCupid say that their potential date's use of proper grammar is one of the best predictors of compatibility and that this signal is surprisingly hard to fake, especially in mail exchanges (vs. profiles which could be wordsmithed by a friend).

I'd never thought about the idea that a "better" designed for-sale site where users would be lead toward creating a proper listing would actually provide worse subjective predictors.


It is definitely possible to buy poorly listed items on Craigslist and relist them at a markup. IMHO, simply adding a picture probably adds 20%.

But then of course you would have to deal with all those deals that look sketchy because they actually are sketchy.


"It amazes me how many people will list something for sale on Craigslist without publishing obvious facts like model numbers."

Doesn't surprise me really.

It's not hard to be a solid seller on Craiglist because everyone else mostly does a terrible job at it.

Even something like photos for a rental are beyond some peoples capabilities.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: